Wikia Bewertungen 49

TrustScore 2 von 5

2,0

Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren

Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren

Das sagen Bewerter

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

EXTREMELY BUGGY WIKI EDITOR the editor is the most horrifying writer's nightmare. I once time used to create some article but whenever I try to edit and add something new, it gets f***ed up e.g. some... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

There are adds everywhere, they treat there users terribly, and It’s all around just a worse experience than competing sites like mirahes and wiki.gg. additionally they know how to work search engines... Mehr ansehen

Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Fandom (or Wikia, Wikicities) is THE best source with Wikipedia. I use this everyday for backrooms, etc. Well, continue the good updates! Good luck, Fandom. - Natolix

Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternen

Fraudulent image viewer that shows "X of X" images (for example, Image "2 of 20"), but when you scroll, the amount of images remaining in the library increases. This appears to be an intentionally f... Mehr ansehen

Wir überprüfen Bewertungen

Unternehmensdetails

  1. Blogger
  2. Pressedienst

Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen

Wikia /ˈwɪkiə/, currently being rebranded as Fandom and formerly known as Wikicities, is a wiki hosting service.


Kontaktinformationen

2,0

Mangelhaft

TrustScore 2 von 5

49 Bewertungen

5 Sterne
4 Sterne
3 Sterne
2 Sterne
1 Stern

So nutzt dieses Unternehmen Trustpilot

Erfahren Sie, woher die Bewertungen stammen und wie sie ausgewertet und moderiert werden.

Unternehmen auf Trustpilot dürfen keine finanziellen oder anderweitigen Anreize oder Gegenleistungen für das Verbergen von Bewertungen anbieten. Bewertungen spiegeln die Meinung einzelner Nutzer wider und nicht die von Trustpilot. Mehr erfahren

Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

-∞/10 || use another wiki hoster instead of fandom

All the info are just used as an estimated amount since most of the info are inaccurate. Dont use their wiki as an trusted source always look for other places so you get more accurate info

They ip banned me for a month for trying to warn and add the official link to the Roblox Pressure Wiki and their reason was for spam, their filter already has the official link filtered out and ip bans ppl from editing the wiki

Their ui is also the worst ever created. They took the MediaWiki ui and filled it to the brim with ads to make as much moneys as possible. The mobile ui on landscape mode is nearly impossible to use cuz of the ads. Did it also mention the horrendous video and that follows you without u asking? And their gamestop (or whatever they have) ad appearing in every corner of the screen?

29. Jänner 2026
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

TOO MUCH ADS!!!

there are ads everywhere, and these obsene video ads cover up like 10% of my screen. the editing experience is as bad as if you had to fix a car that was in the bottom of the ocean, crushed, while people throw soda cans and tomatoes at you.

7. Oktober 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Do not edit for Villains Wiki

This review is specifically about Villains Wiki, rather than Wikia itself.

If you are planning on contributing to edit for Villains Wiki, do yourself a favor and do something else more worthwhile. The moderators on the website are extremely prone to abuse of authority, power-tripping, treating their own user-base like dog shit, and cannot take any kind of criticism whatsoever.

They way they treat their users is flat out unacceptable. Not only are they unhelpful when you need them with something, but they are condescending, rude, volatile and see their own users as numbers. If you get into a disagreement with them, they say demeaning things and insult you like a preteen would, even though these admins are clearly grown adults, but have zero emotional maturity.

If you reprimand them for their behavior, they will permanently ban you from their site for "aggressive and intimidating behavior", even if you are being neither aggressive nor intimidating, that's usually just something they make up so they can have an excuse to throw you out. Unless we're supposed to believe they are easily intimidated by people who don't put up with their inability to treat others with basic human decency? That's pretty ironic, since the moderators like to act tough when it suits them.

And don't even bother reporting an admin's shitty behavior to another admin, they will defend them and make excuses for their actions, usually with something like "they are just tired and having a rough day", even though they ban users left and right when they are also having bad days, which just shows their complete bias and lack of accountability.

And on their Villains Wiki Administrator category page, they have an image of Judge Dredd to represent them, unironically thinking it makes them look cool and badass, which just further shows their complete lack of self-awareness, since Judge Dredd (both the character and the series he is from) was created as a satire of authoritarianism and fascism, and not something to be glorified, though at the same time, it is fitting (albeit, for the wrong reasons), since the Villains Wiki Admins are prone to draconian levels of power-tripping behavior, not unlike the judges from Judge Dredd.

That's really all I can say about Villains Wiki. Not matter how shitty your job is, you're at-least getting paid, unlike Villains Wiki, where you will get even less out of working for them.

14. Juni 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Identity Fraud Hazard

The advertisements they endorse on the website are blatantly scam, and not only scam, but could lead to IDENTITY FRAUD. Never click on the website, don’t use, and straight up mass report them. Identity fraud is a serious issue and this website does not help people avoid it.

10. Juni 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Fandom ad redirect, can't use site

It is completely acceptable to generate most of your income from ads, especially if you're providing a service such as Fandom. However, when you blatantly allow ads to forcibly redirect you from your page with no way to close the ad... then there's a huge problem. Based on my research on this issue it was of some surprise that Fandom is notorious for knowingly allowing this to happen. The redirect ad is 100% not allowing you to use their site to read wiki's. If you back button out, you are sent two pages back.. and if you click back into an article the ad immediately intrudes again. Rinse and repeat... this has been happening for a week... and any response I've met from Fandom is apathetic at best. So... not that it'll affect Fandom nor will they care but I'll never use the site again. Couldn't if I wanted to but even if they are bothered to fix this infuriating issue I still wouldn't use them anymore. They allow this to happen far too often with zero cares to give. What a shame

1. Juni 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternen

stick to any other service like x.

bad customer experience, submitted a ticket, formality came at me as very demanding, bad moderation if you try and open a ticket for someone getting banned they will likely say "we cant ban people sorry" and close the ticket.

27. Jänner 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

It's just horrible.

The people are the problem. Most fandoms you see are nothing but impersonations, have some or a lot of false information, have a lot of mods who give people permanent bans instead of giving them a timeout, and not all things need a wiki. End of story!

Yeah, I know that not all fandoms have to be officially made by the people who made the game, anime, show, movie, etc. But seriously, every fandom I visit is just nothing but garbage.

To all the companies out there, please get every fandom a DMCA strike. I beg of you!

6. Jänner 2025
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Terrible wiki hosting service

Power hungry, filled with ads, selling your data, only thinking about money, do not use this, many wikis have already moved to other wiki hosting services, you should too.

13. Dezember 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Worst site ever

Hi, Fandom disabled my account (Jensonbrad 13) for no reason, I didn't do anything wrong and you shouldn't use it if you don't want to get blocked globally.

I didn't do anything bad, I was following their guidelines and you shouldn't use it, Please use wikipedia for a better

22. November 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

This is garbage

This is garbage. Hopefully you never reproduce! I try to keep this trash from my autistic child and it keeps coming back.

19. Oktober 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Avoid at all costs

There are adds everywhere, they treat there users terribly, and It’s all around just a worse experience than competing sites like mirahes and wiki.gg. additionally they know how to work search engines so that their pages will always appear above the better designed ones in searches.

21. September 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Power Hungry

Don't waste your time creating a wiki that will be removed due to "duplicated wikis" they will remove anything they please. i tried making a wiki for a fan game idea they removed it and said it was a duplicate when i literally said "Fan Game"

20. August 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen

Fandom wants to own your content & community

Be very careful before hosting a wiki here. If the community decides to move somewhere else Fandom will not allow you to refer users to the new wiki. This means search engines will continue to refer new users to Fandom even though the content is many years out of date and these poor users have no idea that the active community is elsewhere.

*Their policy is toxic to open communities.* To read it in full search for "fandom forking policy." A simple adjustment to that policy would stop issues with bad wiki copies and allow official community moves. The only reason I can see for keeping their current policy is that they want to control and milk user created content for ad revenue.

28. Juni 2024
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung
Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen

Fandom (or Wikia)

Fandom (or Wikia, Wikicities) is THE best source with Wikipedia. I use this everyday for backrooms, etc. Well, continue the good updates!

Good luck, Fandom.
- Natolix

23. Mai 2023
Bewertung ohne vorherige Einladung

Ist dies Ihr Unternehmen?

Beanspruchen Sie Ihr Profil, um Zugang zu den kostenfreien Business-Tools von Trustpilot zu erhalten und die Beziehung zu Ihren Kunden zu stärken.

Kostenfreien Account erstellen

So funktioniert Trustpilot

Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.

Unternehmen können über automatische Einladungen zur Bewertungsabgabe einladen. Diese Bewertungen werden mit dem Hinweis „verifiziert“ versehen, um darauf hinzuweisen, dass es sich um echte Erfahrungen handelt.

Erfahren Sie mehr über die verschiedenen Arten von Bewertungen.

Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.

Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.

Hier ​finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.

Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.

Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.

Erfahren Sie mehr