ESQL: planning perf improvements over many fields

[costin]

Description

We've noticed that planning shows up in the profiler when dealing with huge mappings (10k-100k+ fields).
Overall the goal is to add conditional and prevent code for execution on such large number of objects by avoid iteration in the first place.
This meta issue contains a list of (potential) improvements to apply to improve performance in this scenario broken down in two main buckets:

Avoiding execution

• rules working on expressions should perform basic assertion to check whether the logic has to be applied or not, such as checking the size of the collection or attributes.

• avoid creating new AttributeMap/Set by making the collection immutable again so it can be safely passed around
  (wrap the add/removeIf/delete methods through an utility class so they can be passed only for newly created
  objects).
  ESQL: make AttributeMap and AttributeSet immutable #125938

• avoid collection copying unless needed
  Node#transformChildren and QueryPlan#doTransformExpression create a new Array based on the size of
  the children all the time. This should be done lazy and potentially different (clone()).
  ESQL: Lazy collection copying during node transform #124424

• double check array sorting - Analyzer#278/279
  ESQL: high count fields sorting removal #125417

• ProjectAwayColumns always creates an output set clone - 44/83/84
  ESQL: optimise ProjectAwayColumns handling of AttributeSet/Map #126610

Optimized execution of existing code

• LogicalVerifier#verify

• PruneColumns

• PropagateUnmappedFields

• PropagateEvalFoldables

• stop using super inside TypedAttribute/NamedExpression/Attribute/FieldAttribute equals

Currently the equals method delegate to their parent which helps with code but also causes suboptimal equality since the children of the node are compared before the attributes. Better to compare all the node properties first and delegate to the collection as a last result.

• use collection hashing before performing attributes equality
  to avoid comparing large collections, use a hash comparison first before iterating over the collection

• optimize Node#forEachProperty
  prop != children && children.contains(prop) == false && typeToken.isInstance(prop) -->
  prop != children && typeToken.isInstance(prop) && children.contains(prop) == false
  ESQL: Lazy collection copying during node transform #124424

• look in removing/replacing children.contains(prop) inside Node#forEachProperty
  A (linkedhashSet) set would work better and preserve order however it would prevent a child to appear more than once. This can be an issue in projection with duplicate fields (keep a,a,a).

• optimize NameId#hashCode to avoid array boxing (use Long.hashCode(id) instead) ESQL: Lazy collection copying during node transform #124424

• replace Java stream api with regular for-loop

Though brief, stream(), collect(), reduce() & co are slower than their equivalent foreach and pollute the stack trace. They have an edge in parallel processing which, depending on the data size, could yield better results however that's not the case here.

[elasticsearchmachine]

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)