Syncing perfect-numbers exercise #883
Conversation
Used the exercise generator and updated the example file with better variable name.
|
This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested. If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos. For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping |
|
Hello 👋 Thanks for your PR. This repo does not currently have dedicated maintainers. Our cross-track maintainers team will attempt to review and merge your PR, but it will likely take longer for your PR to be reviewed. If you enjoy contributing to Exercism and have a track-record of doing so successfully, you might like to become an Exercism maintainer for this track. Please feel free to ask any questions, or chat to us about anything to do with this PR or the reviewing process on the Exercism forum. (cc @exercism/cross-track-maintainers) |
|
@BNAndras I think I did this right... used the generator (after discovering/learning/remembering how to use it). |
| "solution": ["perfect-numbers.lisp"], | ||
| "example": [".meta/example.lisp"] | ||
| }, | ||
| "authors": ["verdammelt"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we also include "Average-user" as an author here? It feels right to keep the original author credited.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh yeah, did not mean to remove authorship - I didn't check the diff well enough for this file.
Used the exercise generator and updated the example file with better
variable name.