Endlessly amusing to me that Nightwing was originally a New York hero.

Because that's where the Titans were based when he made his debut as Nighting – he was a full-time Titan then! And the thing is, even when he later settled in Blüdhaven he was still going to New York after the team reformed (Titans 1999). And then in Outsiders (2003) it's where his team was based again. And then, after Blüdhaven was nuked, he fully moved there as a solo hero (Nightwing 1996).

So we have a superhero that is tightly connected to Gotham and who works there a lot, who created this identity in New York and was based there for a significant amount of time, but who also claimed Blüdhaven as his city.

What I'm saying is, I think citizens of those three cities should beef more about who gets to claim that Nightwing is their city's hero lmao

I think it would be really funny if New Yorkers claimed the Blüdhaven guy had stolen their guy’s name, since Nightwing was associated with different costumes in both cities until after One Year Later.

Oh that's brilliant lmao

This is Nightwing, leader of the Titans, the world-famous and legitimate superhero team who work to save the world:

And this is some random guy who decided to be a vigilante in Blüdhaven. Beats up thugs in dark alleys. Wanted by the police. Tarnishes real Nightwing's good name:

Brotherhood of The Orb

[guy confused about lesbian relationship voice]: okay ... so which one only tells lies?

awesome

Getting up at 6 am IRL: aw fuck it’s so early oh my god

Getting up at 6 am in an rpg: *banging pots and pans together in front of the cobbler’s shop* WAKEY WAKEY THE SUN IS UP I WANT SOME SHOOOOOOOES

customers the same in all universes

this is it. this is the best response i’ve ever received on this post. everyone pack up, go home, we’re done here

If anyone is more interested in the work behind the Gävle goat there is apparently a documentary here, mostly in swedish, but what I found most charming is that you can climb into the goat through a door in it's behind.

And if you ever wondered: yes, according to rumors a couple have fucked in the Gävle goat. In 1966 in fact, the first year it was up and before any kind of arson. I don't know why they threw that into the documentary but this goat has layers is all I'm saying.

Uppdate: The link seems dead, here is a drive link with the documentary, now with both swedish and english subtitles :)

Like for the goat to burn. Reblog for people to fuck inside the goat.

Hopefully not at the same time.

Like for the goat to

burn. Reblog for people to

fuck inside the goat.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

going to the strip clup with pip plup

My Very Punctual Wife Gets My Night Worm can also be used to remember the order of the planets in the solar system!

Mercury Venus Pearth Wars Goopiter Maturn Nuranus Weptune

She maturn on my pearth til I goopiter

blank version, please make this the new infodumping meme

i don't WANT to drink water I WANT a bard to draft a eulogy for me to criticise!!!!!!!

I appreciate that people also liked this one

debating if it would be funnier to have a bumper sticker saying "my other ride is a [exact make and model of the car the sticker is on]" or "my other ride is a [equally shitty but different car]"

2008 Honda Civic with the bumper sticker "My other ride is a 2007 Honda Civic"

This post has found its target market

Well, the effort was there.

is it a hot take to say that i think you need to understand why something is bad, not just that it simply is?

ALT

this is a part of the problem

you need to be able to explain why you shouldnt use ai rather than “oh well its obviously bad and you shouldnt use it or else youre a bad person” because that isn’t logic. “ai generates child porn based off of real children and whether or not it does is entirely up to how it is built and if pedophiles are able to find ways around those safeguards, because ai cannot in itself discern right from wrong” is a genuine criticism. “amazon tried to build a data center the size of tuson outside of tuson just to power their ai that would’ve increased the inability to stay alive outside in parts of arizona” is a genuine criticism. even “using generative ai teaches you not to learn how to do things yourself even when they’re difficult, devaluing necessary skills out of practice” is a genuine criticism when you look at the amount of people who think they are able of doing a difficult major when they couldnt write their own papers in high school.

but “ai is just bad because it’s bad” will convince no one and is a morally lazy position to take. about anything!

you need to know why reading someone’s diary is wrong if you want to learn about privacy and respect. you need to know why child sexual assault is wrong if you want to be able to help children form healthy age appropriate relationships. you need to know why capitalism is bad if you want to replace it with something else. you need actual concrete ideas and ideologies rather than “you should agree with me because i have the right vibe”