illusionremember

Illusion, remember? People see what they want to see...

Tayber (ze/zem/zir, she/her, he/him) 35+ Queer AF
Whatever you think I am, you're probably incorrect.
☆☆☆
I talk about stories a lot. Doing what I can to help.
Censorship is Bad. Write Whatever You Want Forever.
multimedia, multifandom, multi-interpretations, and multishipping
☆☆☆
See pinned post for details on general content, main tags & fandoms, and other online haunts.

Tagged posts

Showing 606 posts tagged queer stories

rcedge

I think acting like heated rivalry is cringe and unimportant is in and of itself cringe and i think acting like you're cool for not watching a tv show is even cringier

rcedge

the popularity of the show forcing an extremely conservative sports league to talk about gay issues en masse + the celebration of gay love and gay sex in a political moment where both of those things are increasingly (once again) under attack in a very public way is cool and i won't be made to pretend otherwise

bloodraven55

image
image

the day people learn that they can express negative opinions about queer rep without misusing the word queerbait is the day i will know peace

an-asshole-catboi

Something I really love about Bury Your Gays by Chuck Tingle is the point he makes about overcorrecting from the original trope. Sanitizing queer art to the point that nothing bad happens to queer characters ever is not only unrealistic, not only shitty to tell queer people what part of their stories they are or are not allowed to tell, it's also just putting us in another box. The beauty of queer art is when we just get to create what we want to and tell our stories authentically. There's a place for fluffy feel-good queer romance and horrifically fucked up queer horror. As long as queer people and those who love us get to tell our stories in a way that is meaningful, that resonates with the people who interact with it, that is all that should matter.

queerlyloud

I think one of my favorite things about Bly Manor is how, when you watch it again and again, you get to see all the ways Jamie loves Dani. She includes all the little teases about Dani being American, how bad she was at making tea, her annoying fake accent, her silly way of making awful, awful jokes to break tension, how clingy she was, and how foolish sometimes. Jamie could have left all that out, she could have let those details fall away and forgotten them after all that time in the face of Dani's Great Sacrifice, but she didn't. She includes them, because she remembers them, because she remembers Dani exactly as she was, because she loves Dani exactly as she was. She doesn't love an idea or a value or a concept or a belief. She loves Dani, in everything she was. Bly Manor is one of the greatest love stories ever told and I hope people keep on hearing and listening to it.

been thinking about the closet and how people write about it and how it sucks because so many networks and publishers only wanna hear about the closet if it’s some teenager figuring out they’re gay and coming to terms with that and then they gotta come out to all their friends and family and their whole school and their whole community in preferably the most dramatic way possible so everyone can prove how woke the characters all are by having them group hug except for maybe one asshole who’s the token homophobe who nonetheless will come around (if it’s their parent or friend) or else will be written off as non-noteworthy bigot (if it’s some old geezer or mean girl no one likes anyways)

and how that’s not how the closet or coming out works at all because we are always coming out of the closet. you don’t make a big announcement and then everyone knows. You start with like one or two people that you trust, and then you move outwards until everyone you trust knows. And you gotta keep coming out and coming out and coming out and coming out and sometimes you get sick of having that conversation or you know someone will have a bad response or you don’t know a person enough to care if they know so you DON’T come out and you just exist and people figure it out or they don’t.

a lot of times we know damn well that we’re queer, and we’re not agonizing about ourselves but we know it’s not safe, so we don’t tell people. But we fucking know we’re queer and we don’t need some elder queer or woke & worldly straight to explain to us that it’s normal and okay to be queer and it’s no one else’s fucking business anyways

and every time someone insists that a character can’t be queer because we don’t see them kiss another person or state outright that they are queer complete with microlabels and a sad face so we know that they’re deeply disappointed in their lot in life, it makes me wanna scream because

the audience is not owed the character coming out to you

and that’s all that kind of moment is at the end of the day. It’s not even about coming out to their loved ones. It’s about coming out to the audience. the clear-cut statement of who they are so that you the onlooker can feel validated and satisfied. If you need to see a character kiss or hear them say “I’m gay” to admit that they aren’t straight then what you really want is for the character to come out to you.

Queer people and characters do not owe you self-identifying language and peeks into their relationships and that doesn’t fucking mean they’re actually straight unless otherwise said. Way too many people are attacking and belittling REAL PEOPLE because their heteronormative worldview doesn’t allow for queer people to see and recognize themselves in others — they think you’re part of this group or that group and everyone needs to show ID to interact.

Anyways, people in the closet, I love you. I will hold the door for you as long as you need. I’ll station myself outside so that you can feel safer, whatever you need.

blanketforcas

image

still thinking about this interview with Richard Siken and especially this part. thinking about it in relation to all the pushback (both from tptb and society in general) against gay ships in media, like johnlock and destiel and how often their relationship is desexualized, as a weapon to discredit, to unqueer

just-antithings

image

apparently romanticizing mlm is evil now too

dustytales

It's truly an insane take. Having room to be a "fujoshi" was really important to me as part of my journey as a gay trans man. I truly worry the current environment stifles the same exploration of gender that lead me to truly finding happiness in myself.

trainsgengar

ashdean is so important to me bc it's evidence that dean has been queer and known he's queer the whole time. they're fully flirting. unapologetically. so many people only recognize dean's queerness once cas is introduced. i can see how they'd overlook dean's queer interactions before cas' introduction bc they are so much more subtle than his very clear, obvious attraction to cas, but he's been queer coded since day one.

dftwm

okay we really need to talk about it

I guess every person who believes in bi!Dean has ever thought “but why has this silly guy never come out? He’s obviously flustered by men but he never really tries”.

And!

There’s the cut scene from 14x14, “Ouroboros”, where Dean says John used him as a bait for evil truckers.

image

And if we think more than a second, we can see young Dean with his big green eyes and plump lips, playing innocence and taking dirty hints to distract the monster.

So. One more time.

Dean knocks on the door, smiles, flirts, winks and finally gets inside.

John is getting ready. Dean is still in the truck cabin with a lustful monster.

How far is he going? Hardly think John cares. He’s waiting for the perfect moment, while Dean is being touched or maybe even kissed, because Dean is a good soldier. And good soldiers don’t ruin the Hunt.

image

It wasn’t one time or two.

“Dad made me do it all the time”.

Dean was being touched by men against his will constantly, so over time he just couldn’t perceive gay people as he used to do.

We all talk about John being homophobic, but what if it wasn’t the reason?

What if Dean just couldn’t imagine himself with a man and not see all these truck drivers instead?

What if that’s why he never flirts with men in early seasons.

He still remembers too well. He still sees not enough positive examples.

What if that’s why a little later even drunk he could only flirt, but not sleep with men. Because sleep means lust. And men’s lust is disgusting and dangerous.

image

What if only years later he watches “Brokeback mountain” for the first time, witnesses Jack Twist’s love and yearning and pain and thinks “wow. that was pure. that was real”.

What if the process we can see through all the seasons is not a getting rid of the internalized homophobia, but a healing?

image
undomesticated-animal

I should talk more about topping because honestly I actually do think that there's an asymmetry in how bottoming and topping are perceived on this site that has at least a little to do with how rare it is for tops to be allowed to to safely talk about their desire in any setting that isn't harshly guarded against judgement and shame

And like. Topping is great actually. I love it a lot. But finding bottoms who are actually interested in their top as opposed to interested in BEING topped can make you really feel like topping is unwelcome in queer sexual spaces. Don't have the focus to do it now, but remind me lmfao

undomesticated-animal

Okay I'm back let me start with this.

I am not an exclusive top. At this point in my life I'm pretty evenly vers and it's FUCKING great, but ALSO it has become very obvious to me as a vers how few people actually get the chance to be anything but exclusive top/bottom in their existing dynamics.

And like. In the grand scheme of things, that's not the worst thing in the world but on the other hand.

When I was engaged in college, my fiance was an exclusive bottom both penetratively and power wise, and friends. Friends I learned something about bottoms that it took me WAY too long to fully internalize

A lot of us choose to bottom because it allows us to give up our own agency of sexual activity and desire, and we do this not because we are actually enjoying the giving up of agency but because taking ownership of the agency, interacting with it consciously, is too painful.

I say "we" and "us" here because this includes me! When my fiance left me I could barely stand to ask for anything in bed, I just wanted someone to DO THINGS to me and not have to think about how I got there. This was a VERY bad time for me AND for the partners I was asking to top me. I try really hard not to do this anymore as a bottom. But it's a little heartbreaking how often it surprises the tops I am with that anyone would do things like casual aftercare touches, clean up, debriefs, massages, whatever. They get so blushy when I scratch their scalps and have them lay their heads in my lap and talk to me about how it felt. On the one hand, I treasure these moments. On the other hand, it makes me really sad how many tops seem to collapse into the brief moments of respite I'm offering them.

I'm planning to do more erotic writing about this later, but for now I just want to make the point that I literally burned out on topping for a DECADE because it is too easy as a bottom to put all of the emotional weight of intimacy and connection building on the top. It's easy to abdicate our own responsibility and participation in sexual desire. But "service top" can't keep being code for "I am burning myself out for other people's fantasies without ever knowing if I'm actually achieving it OR enjoying my own fantasies"

benjibright

I read this whole thing then read it again and felt the surprise that OP was talking about that they as a bottom perform aftercare with their top(s). Even reading it, even in the context of this message, I still immediately assumed/defaulted to the concept of the top catering in every way to the bottom and their desires and needs.

I think in the last maybe two years the tumblr discourse on tops having more or less the same agency and utility as takeout has calmed down, but burning out as a top is so real. So hyper real.

I've told similar stories on this site before, but I used to spend time and energy as a worldbuilder for other people's fantasies (online and in-person). I constructed elaborate sexual rituals and rites, made spreadsheets, conducted in-depth interviews, investigated their every sexual impulse and inclination, built digital programs, tried very very hard to sustain something like a religious fervor in my partners all for the asking price of a 'hell yeah, that was fun.'

But I realized that I was just shoveling the coal of my own desires and fantasies into the engine while the people bottoming for me provided little reliable emotional or erotic connection. In nearly every situation they were looking to be entertained and engaged, passively. They wanted someone to do shadow puppets on the wall while they lay in bed and watched.

These days I funnel that same energy into D&D because even when I throw my players off cliffs they show up consistently and emote.

So yeah, playing the top burned me out on sex for a while. Play stopped being playful when I realized that mostly I was the one playing and the other party was just waiting for me to deliver the plot. And just rolling over and bottoming so someone else could take up the mantle because I was burned out and empty left me feeling like I'd become part of the problem. (And half the time I'd just end up as the de facto top again eventually.)

It's less dire these days, but it's never going to be what it was before. I'm pretty clear about that now. I can't bear the load for such meager rewards.

Here's the point, so you don't burn your top(s) out: be fun, be a good fucking hang. Communicate and show up and be present. Every scene, every fuck, can't lead to the bottom half-unresponsive facedown on the mattress like they're trying to escape. You have to interrogate the inner life of your tops. Tell them when they've done a good job, compliment them, and be goddamned specific: "I love how your hair got all sweaty, and you really turned me on with how much eye contact you gave, can we do more of that?"

It's not enough to douche (if anal is a part of your thing) and show up. You have to actually be in the room or the other party will walk out of it eventually.

butts-bouncing-on-the-beltway

I really like seeing people respond to this as it resonates because I really think a lot of us lack the language for this conversation, and that's not fair because it's an important one!

So here's my go-to template for after-care with EVERYONE that I sleep with, not just my tops:

Interaction: some kind of snuggling and casual touch, usually something like giving them a lil scalp massage or laying on them like a human blanket, whatever is comfortable for them, the only rule I have is that I do NOT reinitiate sexual contact, if my partner does, I will often happily participate, but after care performance and sex do not go together as a process imo (your mileage may vary! This is a personal preference for me and many of my partners!)

Questions:

  1. What was something that happened that you liked
  2. What was something that happened that could be different next time (this can include "I didn't like this" but it could also include things like "I liked x but y would make it even better for me")
  3. What's something you might want to try in the future?

Btw, these questions are for me to answer too! It's an exchange, part of how we can lower the stakes of learning each other such that being proactive during sex doesn't feel as scary or overwhelming.

Anyway, go forth and enhance the sexual pleasure of the moment for everybody my friends.

dailyhudsonwilliams

Hudson Williams Tells Andy Cohen He Gets Messages from Closeted Pro Athletes (x)