You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(10) |
2004 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(15) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(11) |
2006 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
2007 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
2010 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(34) |
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(1) |
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(9) |
2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
(3) |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
(3) |
26
(4) |
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
From: John P. <par...@sp...> - 2006-10-26 23:33:38
|
si...@lk... wrote: > Hello there, > I am sorry for the basic question, but i could not find a simple example > of plotting an array with gnuplot.py. > let's say i do the following: > e=4,5,6,7,8,9 > g=Gnuplot.Gnuplot > g.Data=e > what next? First of all, you need to instantiate Gnuplot (notice the parentheses): g=Gnuplot.Gnuplot() Then g.plot(e) will give a very basic plot. For more examples, look at demo.py in the Gnuplot.py installation directory. Good luck! John -- ************************* John Parejko Department of Physics and Astronomy 215 895-2786 Drexel University Philadelphia, PA ************************** |
From: <si...@lk...> - 2006-10-26 22:03:21
|
Hello there, I am sorry for the basic question, but i could not find a simple example of plotting an array with gnuplot.py. let's say i do the following: e=4,5,6,7,8,9 g=Gnuplot.Gnuplot g.Data=e what next? thanks, g |
From: Michael H. <mh...@al...> - 2006-10-26 20:18:33
|
John Parejko wrote: > Personally, I would completely replace Numeric with numpy, as numpy is > under very active development, includes greater functionality (at least > as Gnuplot.py is concerned) and has quite a few bugfixes. What I want > to know is whether anyone on the list really wants Numeric to remain, or > whether people are happy migrating to numpy, now that it has been > officially released. > > Please let me know what you think, either way. It would be fine with me. Michael |
From: Crider, J. A <jos...@bo...> - 2006-10-26 19:04:07
|
My application is already using numpy and scipy and Gnuplot.py is the only reason I still have for keeping Numeric installed, so I would love to see it replaced by numpy. Allen=20 -----Original Message----- From: John Parejko [mailto:par...@sp...]=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:30 AM To: Gnu...@li... Subject: [Gnuplot-py-users] imminent numpy support Hello! I've been rather silent since taking up Gnuplot.py support. Unfortunately, life got in the way; it does that sometimes. But I have managed to move my local version completely (I hope) over to numpy, replacing Numeric. Numpy 1.0 has just been released, so I hope to check in my changes shortly. Feel free to make comments and submit any bugs you find. See here for the latest numpy news: http://www.scipy.org/ Personally, I would completely replace Numeric with numpy, as numpy is under very active development, includes greater functionality (at least as Gnuplot.py is concerned) and has quite a few bugfixes. What I want to know is whether anyone on the list really wants Numeric to remain, or whether people are happy migrating to numpy, now that it has been officially released. Please let me know what you think, either way. Thanks! John ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Gnuplot-py-users mailing list Gnu...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnuplot-py-users |
From: iCy-fLaME <icy...@gm...> - 2006-10-25 19:05:30
|
On 10/25/06, Alan G Isaac <ai...@am...> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, John Parejko apparently wrote: > > What I want to know is whether anyone on the list really > > wants Numeric to remain, or whether people are happy > > migrating to numpy, now that it has been officially > > released. > > Go numpy! I've switched completely. > Thanks for supporting it! > > Cheers, > Alan Isaac > Yes, I second that. There might still be some of my old codes using Numeric, but 98% of them have moved on to numpy about 6 months ago. iCy |
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-10-25 18:42:44
|
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, John Parejko apparently wrote: > What I want to know is whether anyone on the list really > wants Numeric to remain, or whether people are happy > migrating to numpy, now that it has been officially > released. Go numpy! I've switched completely. Thanks for supporting it! Cheers, Alan Isaac |
From: John P. <par...@sp...> - 2006-10-25 16:29:47
|
Hello! I've been rather silent since taking up Gnuplot.py support. Unfortunately, life got in the way; it does that sometimes. But I have managed to move my local version completely (I hope) over to numpy, replacing Numeric. Numpy 1.0 has just been released, so I hope to check in my changes shortly. Feel free to make comments and submit any bugs you find. See here for the latest numpy news: http://www.scipy.org/ Personally, I would completely replace Numeric with numpy, as numpy is under very active development, includes greater functionality (at least as Gnuplot.py is concerned) and has quite a few bugfixes. What I want to know is whether anyone on the list really wants Numeric to remain, or whether people are happy migrating to numpy, now that it has been officially released. Please let me know what you think, either way. Thanks! John |
From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-10-11 23:27:54
|
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Carl Wenrich apparently wrote:=20 > I installed numeric, gnuplot, and gnuplot-py. When I try=20 > to run python demo.py, I get this: > No module named Gnuplot ---=20 Find it on your disk. Check sys.path. Apparently you put it outside of sys.path. Cheers, Alan Isaac |
From: Carl W. <car...@ya...> - 2006-10-11 20:22:03
|
It's working now. |
From: Carl W. <car...@ya...> - 2006-10-11 17:59:58
|
I installed numeric, gnuplot, and gnuplot-py. When I try to run python demo.py, I get this: --- Traceback (most recent call last): File "demo.py", line 22, in ? import Gnuplot, Gnuplot.funcutils ImportError : No module named Gnuplot --- Please advise, Carl |