
Here are three major observed likes:
1. Clear, fact-based visibility of the workday
ProHance gives a structured view of logged, productive, idle, and away-from-system time, helping move productivity discussions from perception to data.
2. Minimal effort for end users with smart automation
Most activity is auto-captured, with only light user inputs for off-system work, making adoption easier and less intrusive.
3. Strong analytics for productivity and improvement conversations
Trend analysis, outlier views, and logged vs productive hour insights support informed decision-making for managers and PMOS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Here are two commonly observed dislikes:
1. Requires user discipline for accurate data capture
While much activity is auto-captured, ProHance still depends on users correctly updating Away from System activities (meetings, trainings, leaves). When this is missed, data quality suffers and follow-ups are needed, as seen in acceptance and activation issues during rollout.
2. High need for change management and continuous monitoring
ProHance is effective only when SPOCs actively monitor adoption, acceptance, and outliers. Without regular follow-ups and communication, users may resist or misunderstand the intent, increasing operational overhead for PMOs and admins Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Validated through LinkedIn
Organic review. This review was written entirely without invitation or incentive from G2, a seller, or an affiliate.






