Avatar

Fightin' Pythonist

@atomic-two-sheds / atomic-two-sheds.tumblr.com

Gen-Xer mostly here to follow/reblog. Don't expect deep thoughts. This blog accepts and loves you for who you are.

the idea of going to the movies alone being like sad and pathetic is crazy to me like thats barely a social event to me. If you try to talk to me during a movie at the movies I will kill you.

FIRE EMERGENCY IN CHILE

Over the last days the most important nature parks in the south of Chile have caught fire, it is a huge ecological disaster that has already cost the lives of at least +20 people and thousands of destroyed homes, this is how you can help with donations to rescue aid and firefighters:

Please repost official sources in social media (Banco Estado, Banco de Chile, Radio Bío-Bío, Canal 9)

- If you're abroad but want to help please contact embassies to check out if they have already set up official accounts that would make donations easier

- Volunteers are welcome to help on ground, please check the action protocols beforehand

Listen, brother, nearly 40% of all accidents represent nearly half of all accidents.

I finally escaped from the clutches of the rogues long enough to make some batfam doodles

Steph channeling her inner cupie doll in that one panel.

Seriously she looks so fucking adorable how can Babs look at her and just start forging adoption papers?

Social media without socializing

From the earliest days of social media, social media bosses have been at war with sociability. To create a social media service is to demarcate legitimate and illegitimate forms of sociability. It's a monumental act of hubris, really.

It was ever thus. The founder of Friendster decreed that people could only form friendship bonds with each other, but could not declare themselves to be "friends" of everyone with a common interest. You and I could be friends, but you couldn't be "friends" with a group called "bloggers." Each member of that group would have to create a reciprocal friendship link to see one another's feeds.

Way back in 1999, Larry Lessig taught us that "code is law." By encoding these restrictions into the feed, Friendster's programmers were putting limits on the kinds of relationships that could be formed using the service. But Lessig's law (code?) is often overidden by an even older principle: William Gibson's 1982 maxim that "the street finds its own uses for things."

Friendster told its users how to be friends with one another, and Friendster's users treated Friendster's management as damage and routed around it. They created accounts with names like "New York City" and whenever anyone friended that account, it friended them back. Users hacked their own way to form "illegitimate" friendships based on affinity into the system:

As social media turned into a billion- (and then a trillion-) dollar business, the urgency of the struggle between how social media bosses demanded that we socialize and how we wanted to socialize only got sharper. Mark Zuckerberg doubtless thought he was covering all his bases when he tossed a casual "It's complicated" to the pulldown menu for defining your relationship status, but that's because he doesn't understand how complicated all our relationships are:

For Zuck, crisply defined relationships were things that he could do simple math on in order to target ads, make recommendations, and sort users into categories. When you need to treat relationships as elements in a series of discrete mathematical operations, the fact that relationships are intrinsically, irreducibly qualitative is a serious bug. So Zuck did what computer scientists usually do when they want to do math on qualitative variables: he incinerated all the qualitative elements by quantizing them, and then did math on the dubious residue that remained:

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.