Avatar

Hyperfixation Dumping Ground

@biceratops7

✨ Elliot (he/they)
👀 I’m an artist! Art blog is elliart7
👹 the flavor of my brain WILL change, just go with it

I’m making a pinned post. Why? Idk, all the cool kids have one

Name: Elliot

Pronouns: he/they

Fandoms (not all active at once): Good Omens, Our Flag Means Death, Sam and Max, Sherlock Holmes, and unfortunately Supernatural if you scroll far enough down

What to find here: mostly metas, the occasional edit or meme, and random thoughts (usually still fandom related)

I’d EXTREMELY recommend not interacting if you: entertain terf shit, are a hardcore transmed, support autism speaks (unless you are autistic), or are going to police my use of the word “queer”

***

Fun fact, I am an artist!

I’m under the name elliart7 pretty much everywhere, no I do not have a Twitter, thank Jod.

Here’s the links to my art accounts, ngl I am STRUGGLING rn 💀

Instagram/ tumblr/ YouTube/ TikTok
Avatar
Reblogged

Easily Debunking the Jax ‘hit and run’ theory.

Images in order:

No car visible. Not even a shadow. It’s still pretty light out at this point. So Jax is walking right now.

Still no car visible. He’s still walking.

THEN the car shows here in this shot. Seems like he’s in the drivers seat rn.

Car again, but his is the ONLY car on this road. The smaller circle further ahead?? Not another car light.

This is the reflective side of a sign… his car lights are reflecting off of that.

There’s no evidence of a hit and run other than the ‘children’s playing’ sign. That’s the only thing, unless you also take in account of Jax’s room. But that is a BIG stretch imho regarding that bit. It is implied as of ep 5 that Jax has some insecurity of his masculinity.

Something to point out too, where the hell is his car before he drives off in it? Is that even his car? Is he leaving his own house? You would think that his car or a parent’s depending on the context would be in the drive way, but he’s seen walking through the neighborhood a decent distance before driving, car not even in sight.

I also don’t think the camera at that point is necessarily his EXACT pov but rather just to show that he’s in a car, since to me it looks to be in the middle of the dashboard. If it’s not a guarantee that he was driving, and he walked a little ways before even getting in the car, he could’ve been picked up by someone.

Avatar
Reblogged

Since TADC keeps on giving me banger post after banger post I’m gonna talk more about it since I saw a clip from a livestream on Twitter and it’s had me thinking about the characters ages.

Gooseworx confirmed on a livestream that the show takes place in 2017. This means Pomni’s birth year is canonically 1992, I could date the other characters’ birth years back from 2017 too but I’m 90% sure that their ages were soft locked when they entered the circus so the years would likely be inaccurate.

We know for a fact that Jax, Gangle, and Zooble entered the circus sometime after 2008 considering the Breaking Bad reference and Jax being familiar with what YouTube is in Untitled. And since Ragatha had no idea what Jax was referring to during the bar scene her entrance predates 2008. Also the bar scene is one of my favourite scenes in the entire series and I wanna delve into it a lot more in the future.

One thing that’s stuck with me regarding Kinger (aside from that iconic line in episode 3 that has haunted every single episode of the show) is the text at the end of his character spot

This can mean one of two things.

1, this is the year the game was supposed to come out

2, this is the year Kinger got trapped in the circus. A lot of stuff got disconfirmed in episode 7 but I’m still convinced that C&A is a real company and Kinger was involved in the development of the circus in some way.

If the latter ends up being the case that likely means that Kinger was born somewhere in 1947 and got soft locked into staying that age since he got trapped.

This would also mean that he’s been trapped there for over 20 YEARS which is horrifying to think about. I’m really mixed on SOMA theory as a concept but even if they are digital copies they’ve still been stuck there for long periods of time so this would still be somewhat accurate.

Also even if they don’t escape in the end (which is becoming more and more likely as the episodes go by) I would still like to see what they looked like in the real world it could be interesting (I NEED TO KNOW IF ZOOBLE WAS AN ALT BADDIE IRL GIVE THE PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT GOOSEWORX-)

Why 2017 in the first place? 2017 is such an oddly specific year. It’s way before the pilot came out but not so far before that the significance of it would be obvious through a largely changed cultural context compared to today.

Me, reblogging from anyone I don't follow: I'm introducing diversity into the gene pool. This will make my mutuals' dashes stronger and healthier.

Me reblogging old posts: I am reintroducing historical species into the gene pool to hybridize with the dashboard equivalent of pugs, making them stronger and healthier.

Me reblogging legacy posts: there are New Users, young Mutuals who were not here for the Old Times and do not remember the Old Ways. Someone must teach them, lest they be Lost.

Me reblogging 20 posts a day from a new hyper-fixation completely out of left field: I must strengthen the bodies and minds of my followers. Only the most determined will remain, and once we’re through, their resilience will know no bounds

Avatar
Reblogged

Too many of y'all need to be reminded of these statements from Goose

"Oh but she could be lying-"

Both Goose and the VAs said that she doesn't lie about significant things.

Jax is not a good person. Caine is not evil.

A reason, EVEN A SYMPATHETIC ONE, is not an excuse

Avatar
Reblogged

Honestly it pisses me off so much that people keep altering the Holmes/Watson dynamic when making comedic adaptations bc they think that the only way to make them funny is for Watson to be really stupid, or for Holmes to be an asshole to him, or for Watson to be constantly chasing after women, etc. Because their actual, original, canonical dynamic is SO RICH with comedic potential!

"A total weirdo and his nice, polite, normal friend who is secretly just as fucking weird as the first guy" is a hilarious dynamic. "Awkward autistic genius who makes everyone uncomfortable and his well-adjusted companion who acts as his normal people translator" is hilarious. "Two guys who are so codependent that they're constantly doing bits and making up inside jokes and everyone else is sick of it" is hilarious. "Extremely self-destructive guy plus the person who's constantly holding him back from running into danger except sometimes their roles completely reverse for a bit as they fight over who gets to take a bullet for the other one" is hilarious. They're so fucking crazy i love them

Avatar
Reblogged

In response to a popular comic that's been floating around.

Headcanons are not activism. Ships are not activism. Fandom engagement at large is not activism. Punching down on someone for relating to a character in their own way, especially by claiming the way they are relating to the character is inherently not progressive, is reductive and damaging. Believing those who disagree with you are bigots and what they bring to the conversation is wrong or irrelevant is reductive and damaging. Telling any group that their headcanons 'overpower' fandom and are 'an epidemic' is reductive and damaging.

You are ostensibly telling someone they're playing with their dolls wrong. We are well past the age to be fighting over who gets the swings at the playground or whether you should go through the monkey bars forwards or backwards. Turning exceedingly minor fandom disagreements into a moral crusade, using the opportunity to feed into existing discourse about vulnerable groups, and refusing to listen to the voices of the group you are harming by mislabeling them all under a pejorative reactionary term to de-legitimize them makes you a bad person. Be better.

peace and love on planet earth or whatever

When I tell people to delete anon hate, to not publish it, it’s not me saying “ignore it and it’ll stop; don’t fight back.” It is 100% petty and spiteful. Honestly, I can’t think of anything better than the person who sent the hate obsessively checking your blog and refreshing and refreshing, waiting for you to reply, and getting increasingly frustrated when the ask they so masterfully crafted never pops up & you just keep posting cute pictures of your pets and talking about how nice your day was.

being so fr when I say that transmisogyny has put feminism back like 50 years

what i thought we had distanced ourselves from was the reduction of women to vaginas and wombs and the ability to bear children. i thought we had progressed past ‘dresses are for women and pants are for men.’ i thought we progressed past the idea that someone is less of a woman if she does not adhere strictly to beauty standards. i thought we progressed past the idea that naturally being comfortable adhering to highly feminine standards is vulgar. but i (sarcastically) guess no one could have predicted that trans-exclusive feminism would be the downfall of all the progress we’ve made

“We’re in danger of losing what the entire second wave of feminism, what the entire second wave of women’s liberation was built on, and that was ‘Biology is not destiny’. ‘One is not born a woman,’ Simone de Beauvoir said, ‘one becomes one’. Now there’s some place where transsexual women and other women intersect. Biological determinism has been used for centuries as a weapon against women, in order to justify a second-class and oppressed status. How on Earth, then, are you going to pick up the weapon of biological determinism and use it to liberate yourself? It’s a reactionary tool.”

Sponsored

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.