My dad came with the best reason to defend the Brotherhood. We watched together the Fallout TV show and i asked who he thought it was most suited to rebuild the wasteland, the NCR or the Brotherhood, mind you, it was the first time he seen anything fallout related. His words:
"Idealy, the NCR seems the best option. But the best option isnt always available in the end like they are. The brotherhood did took over and possibly exterminated philly? Yes. They are awful. Terrible. But, what other choice did Philly had? Live in chaos with muderers and worse in a place it would be a matter of time until it collapsed? Or be dominated by the Brotherhood that although awful, would bring peace even by a lack of freedom. Its awful but those who survived would never be robbed or mudered again. They didnt had options. The NCR wasnt there or in other cities like them. And both do have their points, the NCR used cold fusion to power the city but the Brotherhood is also right, it could be used for much worse. Like those evil scientists from the Enclave, its the whole point of that scientist escaping with the plans in the first place, its not because its a wasteland that its suddently immune to being destroyed or dominated. In fact by Lucy's dad, it showed that specially because its a wasteland some people want to destroy it again. I would choose the NCR, they are more peaceful but the Brotherhood, although awful and genocidal, are sometimes the only option avaiable and itd better to take it then not take it. Maximus choose the Brotherhood because he had nowhere to go to after his town got destroyed, even if awful, the brotherhood are needed and is important."








