THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT PERCH FIGHTS FOR A FATE HE BELIEVES IS RIGHT WHILE ANDY TRIES TO ACCEPT A FATE HE DOESNT KNOW IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE
THEY BOTH DO EVERYTHING WRONG IN THEIR ATTEMPTS AT SETTING UP A FINALE. PERCH THINKS ITS THE END THATS MOST IMPORTANT TO CHANGE, WHILE ANDY WANTS THE JOURNEY TO A SUPPOSEDLY FIXED END TO BE AS SMOOTH AS POSSIBLE SO THATS WHAT HE WORKS TO CHANGE.
PERCH THINKS THE EVIL IS IN THE END HE FEARS AND THE JOURNEY THEYRE EXPERIENCING. ANDY THINKS THE EVIL IS IN THE JOURNEY HE READ AND THAT HE ALREADY AVOIDED.
PERCH THINKS THE EVIL IS IN THE CURRENT STATE (THE JOURNEY). ANDY THINKS THE JOURNEY HAS BEEN CHANGED FOR THE BETTER.
I DONT KNOW ITS JUST ALL COMING AT ONCE YOULL JUST HAVE TO DEAL
They’re fighting for such opposite things. Andy wants Perch to succeed, without considering his part in an epilogue. Perch wants Andy to succeed and, importantly, to be by his god’s side when he does.
They both plan for a future and work for it. They don’t realize they’re working against one another. Perch thinks his Mr. Andy is green lighting all his plots. Mr. Andy thinks Perch is just doing a great job being a good person and knight, naturally leading himself to his “happily ever after.”
Perch feels helpless the whole five years he hides out in the college, feeling that his debt to Andy is unpayable. Andy thinks that would be the only part where he would be important: as a useful little npc guy just giving a better life to his beloved protagonist. Perch works for the whole decade in the castle to get Andy as the Most Viable Option for the next Bagdandi. Andy thinks his own work is over, but can’t help antagonizing his beloathed antagonist. The hard part was the second section for Perch, while it was the “easy” section for Andy (he never really loved himself, did he).