Non-DID plurals are not lying to you about our personal internal experiences or faking large chunks of our own lives in order to upset you, trick you, or gain access to some mysterious benefit that doing so supposedly unlocks.
That is a fucking bonkers claim to make.
Imagine if you made that claim on a singlet– that you thought they were lying about their emotions, internal experiences and large chunks of their lives just to fuck with you personally.
What an extremely arrogant position. Non-DID plurals are just out here living our lives. Stop believing that we’re trying to gaslight you to access some benefit that doesn’t even exist.
“I believe that anyone who says they’re plural who doesn’t have DID is lying and and making up a fake internal experience for the benefit of a performance to outsiders”
has big “I don’t believe that other people have real emotions and they’re actually only faking them and I am the only real person who exists and actually has thoughts and feelings” energy.
What the hell kinda dumpster fire of a blog is this.
Are you actually, genuinely putting fictives/introjects in the same category as KIN????
This is BEYOND unreasonable.
I hope you grow a brain soon. And also realize that ENDO SYSTEMS WILL ONLY BE VALID ONCE THERE IS *ACTUAL* EVIDENCE TO THEIR EXISTENCE.
Endos dont exist.
Wow, it’s been a long time since we’ve gotten anonymous hate. Must be a real dumpster fire out there in syscourse land.
I assume you believe that the only fictionkin that are valid are psychologically based kin too– if you even believe they’re valid at all.
Please grow up and learn that some people have beliefs about their identities that aren’t psychological or mental health related.
Fictionkin and fictives with spiritual origins exist and live their lives in your world every day.
We have real, serious beliefs that are at the core of our existence, and affect the way we live our lives every day in the world.
Saying anyone who is plural has to have DID or they “don’t exist” is childish and absurd.
Obviously we exist, or who is typing this reply to your nonsense?
I hope it's okay to ask, not sure how knowledgable you are about this. Is it possible to have fictives in a OSDD 1a system?
Buddy, any system can have fictives. Any system.
Endogenic. Traumagenic. Spiritual. Psychological. Fictive just means they either are a fictional character, or believe they’re a fictional character.
The nuance comes in only when you believe there’s a difference between those two things, IE: you believe as I do that the spirits of actual fictional characters can literally and metaphysically share someone’s body.
Fictive is a soulbonder/endogenic term that was graciously shared with the DID/OSDD community, please stop trying to appropriate it.
edit:
sources
Here are two of the best sources I can get off the top of my head. Two are DID/OSDD blogs, the other is a more general plurality blogger.
http://if-we-were-to-tell-the-truth.tumblr.com/post/135464828800/whats-a-fictive-alter
http://solipsistful.tumblr.com/post/114068224610
The DID/OSDD specific term for the equivalent of a fictive is a ‘fictional introject’.