Menu
▾
▴
assp-user — General discussion for users of ASSP V1 and V2
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(179) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(243) |
Aug
(270) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(161) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(132) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(161) |
Feb
(114) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(265) |
Jun
(269) |
Jul
(176) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(138) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(136) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(408) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(804) |
Apr
(984) |
May
(829) |
Jun
(427) |
Jul
(397) |
Aug
(745) |
Sep
(176) |
Oct
(564) |
Nov
(748) |
Dec
(1052) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(984) |
Feb
(678) |
Mar
(568) |
Apr
(434) |
May
(644) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(655) |
Aug
(693) |
Sep
(497) |
Oct
(411) |
Nov
(316) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(169) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(143) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(187) |
Sep
(131) |
Oct
(228) |
Nov
(227) |
Dec
(144) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(205) |
Feb
(211) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(186) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(110) |
Oct
(61) |
Nov
(149) |
Dec
(186) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(108) |
Feb
(135) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(115) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(81) |
Aug
(210) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(69) |
Dec
(78) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(175) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(45) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(186) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(58) |
May
(89) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(59) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(157) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(59) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
|
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(56) |
2
(41) |
3
(19) |
4
(48) |
5
(27) |
6
|
|
7
|
8
(10) |
9
(46) |
10
(43) |
11
(43) |
12
(24) |
13
(8) |
|
14
(16) |
15
(14) |
16
(34) |
17
(42) |
18
(39) |
19
(61) |
20
(3) |
|
21
(5) |
22
(19) |
23
(48) |
24
(41) |
25
(60) |
26
|
27
|
|
28
(11) |
29
(34) |
30
(16) |
31
(21) |
|
|
|
|
From: James B. <jl...@bo...> - 2006-05-31 23:36:09
|
One tiny criticism with ASSP that I have is that the units are often not specified for the settings, making things a bit confusing. Often don't know whether times are in seconds or minutes (or days!) - there seems to be no consistency throughout the app, so you can't safely guess. A very small thing given how good ASSP now is. James. On 31/05/2006, at 5:48 AM, Dickson, Paul wrote: > Is that in min? > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-31 22:21:17
|
> I'm still curious about the > rationale behind disabling local sender addresses if local recipient > addresses are being checked. Not sure what you are asking here. Verifying local senders uses the same data as verifying local recipients I beleive, it just requires you to turn it on. " Validate Local Sender Addresses If activated, each sender address with a local domain is checked against Local Addresses and/or LDAP. If Local Addresses and LDAP not exists, it will block all mails with local domains from the internet (spoofing). 0 = no check, 1 = check, 2 = log only, 3 = score only.. " If you don't do checking for local recipients, and don't have a local addresses text file or LDAP functioning, then turning on checking for local senders will block all incoming email from your local domain(s). Doug |
|
From: Tim E. <te...@sp...> - 2006-05-31 22:11:01
|
Too easy!=20 Thanks for the help, it worked great, but I'm still curious about the rationale behind disabling local sender addresses if local recipient addresses are being checked. ...Tim =20 -----Original Message----- From: ass...@li... [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:54 PM To: assp user list Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Forged local domains? > No one should be > delivering mail from my local addresses except for me or my ISP, > especially to me. Then blacklist your local domain. Email out won't be affected, but any email coming in from=20 som...@yo... will be PB scored according to your settings for blacklisted domains. Worked for me until someone wanted to send email from his blackberry and cc=20 himself here. Then I had to remove that one account. Another thing you could do is set up an SPF record for your domain that only=20 allows your server to send email, and then do SPF checking. Doug=20 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-31 21:53:43
|
> No one should be > delivering mail from my local addresses except for me or my ISP, > especially to me. Then blacklist your local domain. Email out won't be affected, but any email coming in from som...@yo... will be PB scored according to your settings for blacklisted domains. Worked for me until someone wanted to send email from his blackberry and cc himself here. Then I had to remove that one account. Another thing you could do is set up an SPF record for your domain that only allows your server to send email, and then do SPF checking. Doug |
|
From: Tim E. <te...@sp...> - 2006-05-31 21:43:47
|
OK, I see that now. I am validating local addresses from a flat file. If I understand this correctly, then if I use Validate Local Addresses, then this feature won't work for me. If I misunderstand, please set me straight. If I do understand correctly, can you explain the rationale for this? I want to drop any incoming mail that is not to a valid local recipient *and* I would like to drop anything coming from outside claiming to be from a local address, whether it is valid or not. No one should be delivering mail from my local addresses except for me or my ISP, especially to me. ...Tim =20 -----Original Message----- From: ass...@li... [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Fritz Borgstedt Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:59 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Forged local domains? Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy <ass...@li...> schreibt: >I thought the latest versions (1.2.2.*) included a provision that >would bounce incoming mail with an envelope sender from a local >domain. I have the following in my cfg file: >=20 >localDomains:=3Dsparling.com|candela.com|yantis.com >localDomainsFile:=3D >=20 >No test modes are enabled. Did I misunderstand this feature or do I >need to enable something else? > =20 Did you ever looked in the section "Validate Sender"? What do you think is meant by : Validate Local Sender Addresses If activated, each sender address with a local domain is checked against Local Addresses and/or LDAP. If Local Addresses and LDAP not exists, it will block all mails with local domains from the internet (spoofing). _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: <pa...@bl...> - 2006-05-31 21:43:36
|
On 31 May 2006 at 22:26, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy > <ass...@li...> schreibt: > >yep ! > > score? -7.00 (hours delay in Sourceforge mailman...) |
|
From: Fritz B. <fb...@iw...> - 2006-05-31 20:58:44
|
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy <ass...@li...> schreibt: >I thought the latest versions (1.2.2.*) included a provision that >would bounce incoming mail with an envelope sender from a local >domain. I have the following in my cfg file: > >localDomains:=sparling.com|candela.com|yantis.com >localDomainsFile:= > >No test modes are enabled. Did I misunderstand this feature or do I >need to enable something else? > Did you ever looked in the section "Validate Sender"? What do you think is meant by : Validate Local Sender Addresses If activated, each sender address with a local domain is checked against Local Addresses and/or LDAP. If Local Addresses and LDAP not exists, it will block all mails with local domains from the internet (spoofing). |
|
From: Tim E. <te...@sp...> - 2006-05-31 20:44:27
|
I thought the latest versions (1.2.2.*) included a provision that would bounce incoming mail with an envelope sender from a local domain. I have the following in my cfg file: =20 localDomains:=3Dsparling.com|candela.com|yantis.com localDomainsFile:=3D =20 No test modes are enabled. Did I misunderstand this feature or do I need to enable something else? =20 ...Tim =20 |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-31 20:34:18
|
> score? 110 with extra points! |
|
From: Fritz B. <fb...@iw...> - 2006-05-31 20:26:26
|
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy <ass...@li...> schreibt: >yep ! score? |
|
From: Marrco <as...@mi...> - 2006-05-31 20:24:12
|
got it ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Traylor" <dtr...@hf...> To: "assp user list" <ass...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:19 PM Subject: [Assp-user] testing list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > |
|
From: Marrco <as...@mi...> - 2006-05-31 20:23:43
|
yep ! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Evans" <te...@sp...> To: "Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy" <ass...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [Assp-user] testing list > Did we pass? > > > ...Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ass...@li... > [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Doug > Traylor > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 6:20 AM > To: assp user list > Subject: [Assp-user] testing list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-31 20:23:32
|
> Did we pass? Aye, finally. |
|
From: Fritz B. <fb...@iw...> - 2006-05-31 20:15:55
|
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy <ass...@li...> schreibt: >Where in the statistics are invalid recipients (LDAP lookup) counted? > >I thought this would be "Local Recipients Rejected" - "Nonexistent >Recipients" but it's not that because that remains zero. > Nowhere. I am in the stage of debugging that section (I hate to do it). The statistics should be there in the newest 1.2.2 . >Nonexistent Recipients |
|
From: Tim E. <te...@sp...> - 2006-05-31 20:02:40
|
Did we pass?=20 ...Tim =20 -----Original Message----- From: ass...@li... [mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 6:20 AM To: assp user list Subject: [Assp-user] testing list _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: Rybski D. <daj...@in...> - 2006-05-31 14:02:03
|
Where in the statistics are invalid recipients (LDAP lookup) counted? =20 I thought this would be "Local Recipients Rejected" - "Nonexistent Recipients" but it's not that because that remains zero. =20 Thanks Dajo |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-31 13:19:42
|
|
From: Armand F. <arm...@st...> - 2006-05-31 11:39:04
|
A Know memory issue in Clamsmtpd could happend in certain condition. =
This a library the clamsmtpd is using. It happened in certain condition =
and distro.
Check clamsmtp list.
-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: ass...@li... =
[mailto:ass...@li...] De la part de Dickson, =
Paul
Envoy=E9=A0: mardi 30 mai 2006 17:30
=C0=A0: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Objet=A0: Re: [Assp-user] running slow
I removed Clamsmtpd from the equation and that seems to have taken care
of it. Anyone else having issues W/ clamsmtpd? I verified the blockage
to be removed by modifying a vbs script for windows cscript that will
send smtp mail to include a do loop that counts to 400, thus spewing 400
mails in a very short time to an outside address specified.
Here is the script if anyone is interested. Watch the line wrap on the
comments:
'This script will spew 400 mails to the recipient specified through the
server specified to test the SMTP functionality and speed of the smtp
server. =20
'When sending to an outside host, you have to allow your IP to relay
through your smtp server, if not already configured that way.
objCount =3D 0
Do
Set objEmail =3D CreateObject("CDO.Message")
objEmail.From =3D "pdi...@fr..."
objEmail.To =3D "pau...@gm..."
objEmail.Subject =3D "stresstest"
objEmail.Textbody =3D "push it baby."
'=3D=3DThis section provides the configuration information for the =
remote
SMTP server.
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing") =3D 2
'Name or IP of Remote SMTP Server
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver") =3D
"nt1s21z.nt1.local"
'Type of authentication, NONE, Basic (Base64 encoded), NTLM
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpauthenticate") =3D
cdoNONE
'Your UserID on the SMTP server
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusername") =3D
"youruserid"
'Your password on the SMTP server
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendpassword") =3D
"yourpassword"
'Server port (typically 25)
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserverport") =3D 25
'Use SSL for the connection (False or True)
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpusessl") =3D False
'Connection Timeout in seconds (the maximum time CDO will try to
establish a connection to the SMTP server)
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpconnectiontimeout")
=3D 60
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Update
'=3D=3DEnd remote SMTP server configuration section=3D=3D
objEmail.Send
objCount =3D objCount + 1
Loop Until objCount =3D 400
-----Original Message-----
From: ass...@li...
[mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:56 AM
To: ass...@li...
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] running slow
Did all that and still having issues. Went back to 1.2.1 final and
seeing how that goes, although usually my exchange outgoing smtp
connector sits damn near 0 in the queue and sends out mail immediately.
Now it builds up to between 16-30 at times. Going to also try replacing
sendmail w/ exim to see if perhaps something in sendmail is corrupt.
-----Original Message-----
From: ass...@li...
[mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:35 AM
To: ass...@li...
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] running slow
ass...@li... schreibt:
>I found the sleep time specification thanks to your guidence. It was
>set to null. The other two options you specified I expected to find
>under PB settings, and looked else where as well, but did no find. =20
>=20
>Where syntax specifically should I look for those?
>=20
>Hoping the change of the null > 10 value of the sleep time fixes it.
I did not recommend that, I wrote:
- check sleeptime -> set it to 0
- check size of black.db -> set extreme expiration lower
- remove exportextreme - file filename if you do not use it
both fields are in pb section called:
ExtremeExpiration
exportExtremeFile
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications
in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D107521&bid=3D248729&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Ass...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Ass...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Ass...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
|
|
From: Rybski D. <daj...@in...> - 2006-05-31 07:03:54
|
My first mail seems to have hit the SF spam filter, so some bleeping is done here: =20 I'm using this regex (made by one of you) to catch some spam with the word *bleep* in it (the regex should make it obvious which word I mean )) =20 P+\s*?h+\s*?a+\s*?r+\s*?m+\s*?a+\s*?c+\s*?y+ =20 This regex catches a lot of variations but it also catches the correctly spelled word *bleep*. I would like to change this regex so that all invalid variations are caught, but *bleep* itself not. How can I exclude it? =20 I hope this makes sense... =20 Thanks Dajo =20 =20 |
|
From: Rybski D. <daj...@in...> - 2006-05-31 06:35:24
|
I'm using this regex (made by one of you) to catch some pharmacy spam: =20 P+\s*?h+\s*?a+\s*?r+\s*?m+\s*?a+\s*?c+\s*?y+ =20 This regex catches a lot of variations but it also catches the correctly spelled word pharmacy. I would like to change this regex so that all invalid variations are caught, but "pharmacy" not. How can I exclude it? =20 Thanks Dajo =20 |
|
From: Gordon W. <gor...@ca...> - 2006-05-31 06:23:56
|
If I put a fake OK in here, what happens to the email / bounce ? I am trying to reduce the amount of bounces generated by spammers. I am running ASSP <http://assp.sourceforge.net> v1.2.1 final on W2k3 Thanks Gordon |
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-30 23:42:37
|
After figuring out that the error did not exist in 122.20 but does in 122.21 and 122.22, I tried 122.24 and there is still some trouble. While it is not doubling up the PB score, it is now not adding any PB score for invalid recipient, verified by looking into the blackDB and can be seen by the following log(PB score should be 25 each based on my config): May-30-06 18:13:14 Connected: 211.202.175.136:1382 May-30-06 18:13:15 211.202.175.136 <vo...@fa...> invalid address rejected: stanton@<mydomain>.com May-30-06 18:13:30 211.202.175.136 <vo...@fa...> invalid address rejected: stanton@<mydomain>.com May-30-06 18:13:30 211.202.175.136 <vo...@fa...> invalid address rejected: stanton@<mydomain>.com May-30-06 18:13:33 211.202.175.136 <vo...@fa...> is disconnected May-30-06 18:13:45 Invalid address rejected: stanton@<mydomain>.com <***** No IP # on line ***** and May-30-06 18:25:13 Connected: 66.76.61.85:56714 May-30-06 18:25:13 66.76.61.85 <> invalid address rejected: sr...@su... May-30-06 18:25:28 66.76.61.85 <> invalid address rejected: sr...@su... May-30-06 18:25:28 66.76.61.85 <> invalid address rejected: sr...@su... May-30-06 18:25:43 66.76.61.85 <> invalid address rejected: sr...@su... May-30-06 18:25:43 66.76.61.85 <> invalid address rejected: sr...@su... May-30-06 18:25:46 66.76.61.85 <> is disconnected May-30-06 18:25:59 Invalid address rejected: sr...@su... <***** No IP # on line ***** ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Traylor" <dtr...@hf...> To: "assp user list" <ass...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:58 AM Subject: [Assp-user] 122.22 introduced logging error for invalid addresses > After moving from 122.21 to 122.22 emails to invalid addresses are getting > normal log entries with PB scoring and then duplicate log entries without > IP# and with additional PB scoring. The problem started with 122.22 and > is > resolved by rolling back to 122.21. This is not from one particular email > address though I am only showing one in the log. Also this is not > consistant. Sometimes it shows only one PB addition, sometimes two. > Sometimes it shows the IP sometimes not. We are using LDAP and a flat > file > to validate our users. > > Thanks, > Doug > > Re: the log, email addresses with my domain have been altered. > The IP should be up to a PB of 150 but is scored 225 due to three invalid > recipients scoring twice for an extra 75 penalty points. > > assp 122.21 > > May-29-06 18:59:17 Connected: 66.201.230.1:44035 > May-29-06 18:59:32 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> invalid > address rejected: <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 18:59:32 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 0+25 => 25 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > May-29-06 18:59:33 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > > May-29-06 19:52:37 Connected: 66.201.230.1:47468 > May-29-06 19:52:38 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> adding new > triplet: (66.201.230.0,of...@co...,<auser>@<mydomain>.com) > May-29-06 19:52:38 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> recipient > delayed: <auser>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 19:52:38 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > > > assp 122.22 > > May-29-06 21:25:46 Connected: 66.201.230.1:40837 > May-29-06 21:26:01 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> invalid > address rejected: <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 21:26:01 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 25+25 => 50 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > May-29-06 21:26:04 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > May-29-06 21:26:16 Invalid address rejected: > <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 21:26:16 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 50+25 => 75 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > > May-29-06 23:18:55 Connected: 66.201.230.1:37671 > May-29-06 23:18:55 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 75+25 => 100 > reason:66.201.230.1:SpamAddress > May-29-06 23:18:55 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> to: > <spamuser>@<mydomain>.com has spam address -> d:\assp/corpus/spam/2805.rpt > May-29-06 23:18:55 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> to: > <spamuser>@<mydomain>.com is disconnected > > May-29-06 23:18:55 Connected: 66.201.230.1:37693 > May-29-06 23:19:11 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> invalid > address rejected: <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 23:19:11 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 100+25 => 125 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > May-29-06 23:19:14 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > May-29-06 23:19:26 Invalid address rejected: > <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-29-06 23:19:26 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 125+25 => 150 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > > May-30-06 00:25:20 Connected: 66.201.230.1:65109 > May-30-06 00:25:35 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> invalid > address rejected: <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-30-06 00:25:35 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 150+25 => 175 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > May-30-06 00:25:36 Invalid address rejected: > <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-30-06 00:25:36 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > > May-30-06 01:57:19 Connected: 66.201.230.1:44399 > May-30-06 01:57:34 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> invalid > address rejected: <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-30-06 01:57:34 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 175+25 => 200 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > May-30-06 01:57:37 66.201.230.1 <of...@co...> is > disconnected > May-30-06 01:57:49 Invalid address rejected: > <invalidaddress>@<mydomain>.com > May-30-06 01:57:49 PB: 66.201.230.1 score: 200+25 => 225 > reason:66.201.230.1:InvalidAddress > > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > |
|
From: Dickson, P. <PDI...@fr...> - 2006-05-30 19:48:18
|
Is that in min? |
|
From: Dickson, P. <PDI...@fr...> - 2006-05-30 15:29:53
|
I removed Clamsmtpd from the equation and that seems to have taken care
of it. Anyone else having issues W/ clamsmtpd? I verified the blockage
to be removed by modifying a vbs script for windows cscript that will
send smtp mail to include a do loop that counts to 400, thus spewing 400
mails in a very short time to an outside address specified.
Here is the script if anyone is interested. Watch the line wrap on the
comments:
'This script will spew 400 mails to the recipient specified through the
server specified to test the SMTP functionality and speed of the smtp
server. =20
'When sending to an outside host, you have to allow your IP to relay
through your smtp server, if not already configured that way.
objCount =3D 0
Do
Set objEmail =3D CreateObject("CDO.Message")
objEmail.From =3D "pdi...@fr..."
objEmail.To =3D "pau...@gm..."
objEmail.Subject =3D "stresstest"
objEmail.Textbody =3D "push it baby."
'=3D=3DThis section provides the configuration information for the =
remote
SMTP server.
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing") =3D 2
'Name or IP of Remote SMTP Server
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver") =3D
"nt1s21z.nt1.local"
'Type of authentication, NONE, Basic (Base64 encoded), NTLM
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpauthenticate") =3D
cdoNONE
'Your UserID on the SMTP server
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusername") =3D
"youruserid"
'Your password on the SMTP server
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendpassword") =3D
"yourpassword"
'Server port (typically 25)
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserverport") =3D 25
'Use SSL for the connection (False or True)
'objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
'("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpusessl") =3D False
'Connection Timeout in seconds (the maximum time CDO will try to
establish a connection to the SMTP server)
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpconnectiontimeout")
=3D 60
objEmail.Configuration.Fields.Update
'=3D=3DEnd remote SMTP server configuration section=3D=3D
objEmail.Send
objCount =3D objCount + 1
Loop Until objCount =3D 400
-----Original Message-----
From: ass...@li...
[mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Dickson,
Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:56 AM
To: ass...@li...
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] running slow
Did all that and still having issues. Went back to 1.2.1 final and
seeing how that goes, although usually my exchange outgoing smtp
connector sits damn near 0 in the queue and sends out mail immediately.
Now it builds up to between 16-30 at times. Going to also try replacing
sendmail w/ exim to see if perhaps something in sendmail is corrupt.
-----Original Message-----
From: ass...@li...
[mailto:ass...@li...] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:35 AM
To: ass...@li...
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] running slow
ass...@li... schreibt:
>I found the sleep time specification thanks to your guidence. It was
>set to null. The other two options you specified I expected to find
>under PB settings, and looked else where as well, but did no find. =20
>=20
>Where syntax specifically should I look for those?
>=20
>Hoping the change of the null > 10 value of the sleep time fixes it.
I did not recommend that, I wrote:
- check sleeptime -> set it to 0
- check size of black.db -> set extreme expiration lower
- remove exportextreme - file filename if you do not use it
both fields are in pb section called:
ExtremeExpiration
exportExtremeFile
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications
in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D107521&bid=3D248729&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Ass...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Ass...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
|
|
From: Doug T. <dtr...@hf...> - 2006-05-30 14:26:43
|
> Without disabling Reversed Lookup, where can I list a domain or IP range > so that the mail will not be rejected due to a missing PTR record? ISP/Secondary MX Servers (ispip): is an IP whitelist that bypasses connection tests but still does content testing. Can be used for any known good email servers you never want to block like hotmail, gmail, yahoo, AOL, business partners, etc. This file is also commonly used for the NoDelay list for IP's you don't want delayed. Accept All Mail (acceptallmail): is an IP whitelist that bypasses connection and content testing and adds the the whitelist. It should be used for servers under your control and possibly business partner's servers. These are to the best of my understanding, Doug Traylor |
13 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
