Menu
▾
▴
assp-user — General discussion for users of ASSP V1 and V2
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(179) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(243) |
Aug
(270) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(161) |
Nov
(110) |
Dec
(132) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(161) |
Feb
(114) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(265) |
Jun
(269) |
Jul
(176) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(138) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(145) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(136) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(408) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(42) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(74) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(804) |
Apr
(984) |
May
(829) |
Jun
(427) |
Jul
(397) |
Aug
(745) |
Sep
(176) |
Oct
(564) |
Nov
(748) |
Dec
(1052) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(984) |
Feb
(678) |
Mar
(568) |
Apr
(434) |
May
(644) |
Jun
(396) |
Jul
(655) |
Aug
(693) |
Sep
(497) |
Oct
(411) |
Nov
(316) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(169) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(143) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(136) |
Aug
(187) |
Sep
(131) |
Oct
(228) |
Nov
(227) |
Dec
(144) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(205) |
Feb
(211) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(186) |
May
(99) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(110) |
Oct
(61) |
Nov
(149) |
Dec
(186) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(108) |
Feb
(135) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(109) |
May
(115) |
Jun
(176) |
Jul
(81) |
Aug
(210) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(69) |
Dec
(78) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(92) |
Jul
(42) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(175) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(45) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(186) |
Jun
(67) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(39) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(58) |
May
(89) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(59) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(35) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(21) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(81) |
Mar
(157) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(64) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(59) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(56) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
|
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
(1) |
8
|
9
|
|
10
(2) |
11
(1) |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
|
From: Daniel M. <dm...@am...> - 2019-02-11 08:04:01
|
That's entirely possible. Even likely. But...did you revise the settings I suggested? Daniel On 2/10/2019 1:01 AM, mar...@gm... wrote: > I think you're wrong. By definition ASSP_AFC means > "AttachmentFullCheck Plugin". > So I don't see, why AFC shouldn't scan all attachments. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Von:* Daniel Miller via Assp-user <ass...@li...> > *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 10. Februar 2019 02:51 > *An:* ass...@li... > *Cc:* Daniel Miller > *Betreff:* Re: [Assp-user] UserAttach problem > > ASSP_AFC is "Archive File Checker" - so it's not involved (I believe) > in processing "plain" exe/bin attachments. > > Set DoBlockExes to block. > > If you're testing against a local or whitelisted sender - set > BlockWLExes to nocheck. Same for BlockNPExes. > > Daniel > On 2/7/2019 2:36 AM, mar...@gm... wrote: > Hi, > I can't get ASSP_AFC 4.89 to block attachments with executable code. > If I configure UserAttach to > <code> > [allDomains]=>block-in=>exe\-bin > </code> > I get > ... > Group allDomains match for: 'loc...@lo...d' > ... > legacy attachment levels are not checked - please configure UserAttach > ... . > If I configure UserAttach to > <code> > block-in=>exe\-bin > </code> > I get > ... > ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'block' > rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) > ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'good' > rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) > se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no UserAttach > rule found > ... . > What the hell am I doing wrong? > Regards, > Markus > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: <mar...@gm...> - 2019-02-10 09:02:04
|
I think you're wrong. By definition ASSP_AFC means "AttachmentFullCheck Plugin". So I don't see, why AFC shouldn't scan all attachments. ________________________________ Von: Daniel Miller via Assp-user <ass...@li...> Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Februar 2019 02:51 An: ass...@li... Cc: Daniel Miller Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] UserAttach problem ASSP_AFC is "Archive File Checker" - so it's not involved (I believe) in processing "plain" exe/bin attachments. Set DoBlockExes to block. If you're testing against a local or whitelisted sender - set BlockWLExes to nocheck. Same for BlockNPExes. Daniel On 2/7/2019 2:36 AM, mar...@gm... wrote: Hi, I can't get ASSP_AFC 4.89 to block attachments with executable code. If I configure UserAttach to <code> [allDomains]=>block-in=>exe\-bin </code> I get ... Group allDomains match for: 'loc...@lo...d' ... legacy attachment levels are not checked - please configure UserAttach ... . If I configure UserAttach to <code> block-in=>exe\-bin </code> I get ... ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'block' rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'good' rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no UserAttach rule found ... . What the hell am I doing wrong? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Ass...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: Daniel M. <dm...@am...> - 2019-02-10 01:51:11
|
ASSP_AFC is "Archive File Checker" - so it's not involved (I believe) in processing "plain" exe/bin attachments. Set DoBlockExes to block. If you're testing against a local or whitelisted sender - set BlockWLExes to nocheck. Same for BlockNPExes. Daniel On 2/7/2019 2:36 AM, mar...@gm... wrote: > Hi, > I can't get ASSP_AFC 4.89 to block attachments with executable code. > If I configure UserAttach to > <code> > [allDomains]=>block-in=>exe\-bin > </code> > I get > ... > Group allDomains match for: 'loc...@lo...d' > ... > legacy attachment levels are not checked - please configure UserAttach > ... . > If I configure UserAttach to > <code> > block-in=>exe\-bin > </code> > I get > ... > ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'block' > rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) > ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'good' > rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach) > se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no UserAttach > rule found > ... . > What the hell am I doing wrong? > Regards, > Markus > > > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user |
|
From: <mar...@gm...> - 2019-02-07 10:36:37
|
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>Hi,</div> <div> </div> <div> <div>I can't get ASSP_AFC 4.89 to block attachments with executable code.</div> <div> </div> <div>If I configure UserAttach to<br/> <code><br/> [allDomains]=>block-in=>exe\-bin<br/> </code><br/> I get<br/> ...<br/> Group allDomains match for: 'loc...@lo...d'<br/> ...<br/> legacy attachment levels are not checked - please configure UserAttach<br/> ... .</div> <div> </div> <div>If I configure UserAttach to<br/> <code><br/> block-in=>exe\-bin<br/> </code><br/> I get<br/> ...<br/> ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'block' rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach)<br/> ZIP: se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no 'good' rule found for compressed attachments (see UserAttach)<br/> se...@an...d -> loc...@lo...d => no UserAttach rule found<br/> ... .</div> <div> </div> <div>What the hell am I doing wrong?</div> <div> </div> <div>Regards,</div> <div>Markus</div> </div></div></body></html> |
